Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Doug Summers Stay's avatar

In this paper we showed that if you ask GPT-3 to decide how novel and useful its own answers are, it can actually do better than human level on the AUT: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=8HwKaJ1wvl

Expand full comment
Phil Tanny's avatar

Regrettably, being creative just isn't enough. One also needs to have the judgement necessary to sort through the big pile of ideas a creative person will typically generate to identify those ideas that are actually worth acting on. Without such judgement in adequate measure the creative person is likely to choose the idea they had the most fun creating.

Creativity can be a huge time waster in some cases. While the practical person will probably choose the well known solution that is already available, the creative person may waste a ton of time trying to reinvent the wheel so as to creatively solve a problem that's already been solved.

A truly creative person often isn't sensible, for they value the experience of creativity over results. They don't want an idea that works, they want a hundred ideas that can serve as a launching pad for further creativity.

A creative person will often cherish their own ideas as they would their own children, and cling to them stubbornly, even if they are actually pretty bad ideas. For the creative person, any creative idea is by definition a good idea, just for being the product of creativity.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts