Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Conor Grennan's avatar

Another bit of sorcery: After it gives you an answer, ask it to critique its own response, poke holes in it, then ask it to improve its response based on that critique. (Thanks for this, Ethan!)

Expand full comment
Sonja the Grey's avatar

I want to offer one example where role matters and absolutely changes the answer. In the MBA teacher/clown example, the output is ultimately very similar - you're still getting a similar list of action items.

But in areas that are a little more "edgy" in some way, giving it a role changes the fundamental output. Spirituality is my best example, especially spiritual tools.

I've come at it three ways so far, to experiment with the idea - no role, "act as an expert scientist," and "act as a shaman/western astrologer/chaos magician." And then ask spiritual/energetic/woo questions.

* No role offers up some vague, Cosmo magazine style answers, with a caveat that these things are all pseudoscience and other avenues should be pursued.

* Expert scientist has pretty much no input. It may as well say "yeah no I don't believe in any of that."

* Shaman/astrologer/chaos magician will get straight into the mud with you. In depth analysis, visualization ideas, things to try, spells to cast. And no shaming, either.

From what I understand, too, we are going to move into a place where AI "roles" are going to become more important to give the AI. Because since bias can't actually be removed completely, it's going to be our only way of giving people a way to express the bias they want (that they see as unbiased).

... Also I super love your newsletter and thank you for this work you're doing, it's been so valuable. 🙏

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts